Single-arm prospective study comparing ablation zone volume between time zero and 24 h after microwave ablation of liver tumors.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous thermal ablation is an effective treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors and is a recommended local therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Reported evidence shows an increase in the ablation zone volume over the first 24-h post-liver ablation. This report compares ablation zone volumes immediately at the completion (T = 0) of 26 microwave ablations of liver tumors to 24-h post-procedure (T = 24) volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 patients, 13 (65%) males, underwent a total of 26 hepatic microwave ablations (MWA) under ultrasound guidance. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) or MRI was performed immediately and another CECT 24 h post operatively. Evaluation of the ablation zone and comparison of the two post-operative scans were done using BioTrace software. The expansion of ablation zones on post-op CECTs was matched point by point per direction. The distance between each 2 points was measured and grouped by distance. The incidence of each specific distance was then converted into a percentage, first for each case separately, then for all cases altogether. Data were tested by a matched paired one-sided t test. RESULTS: The median lesion diameter was 1.5 cm (range 0.5-3.3) with 16 (62%) HCC cases and 9 hepatic metastases (4 neuroendocrine carcinoma, 4 colorectal carcinomas, 1 breast carcinoma, 1 pancreatic cancer). The data show a consistent volume expansion greater than 30% (p = 7.7e-5) 24-h post-ablation, where the median expansion is 57%. Distances between T = 0 and T = 24 equal to 3-7 mm occur in over 35% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The ablation zone expansion at 24-h post-op was not uniform. The final ablation zone is difficult to predict at the time of the procedure. The awareness of the ablation zone expansion is important when treating near-critical structures, managing the heat sink effect, and preserving liver parenchyma.

Establishing a telemedicine program for interventional radiology: a study of patient opinion and experience.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare officials to implement new policies, such as the use of virtual consultations over office-based medical appointments, to reduce the transmission of the virus. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare patients' experiences with virtual outpatient telemedicine encounters at a single academic institution in Interventional Radiology (IR) and in-person visits during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS The TeleENT Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Medical Communication Competence Scale (MCCS) were used to survey patients' satisfaction with both in-person and virtual office visits. RESULTS Ninety respondents (38 in-person, 52 virtual) acknowledged numerous benefits of virtual visits versus in-person office visits including reductions in time, cost, and potential viral transmission risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. No statistically significant difference was noted, based on a Likert scale from 1 to 7, between in-person and virtual visits (all p > 0.05) for scheduling related factors. No statistically significant difference was noted in any of the MCCS subscales between the two cohorts in regards to medical information communication (all p > 0.05). A majority of patients with virtual encounters (82.7%) stated that it was easy to obtain an electronic device for use during the telemedicine visit, and 73.1% of patients felt that setting up the telemedicine encounter was easy. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that telemedicine is an acceptable alternative to in-office appointments and could increase access to IR care outside of the traditional physician-patient interaction. With telemedicine visits, patients can communicate their concerns and obtain information from the doctor with noninferior communication compared to in-person visits.

May-Thurner: diagnosis and endovascular management.

Common left iliac vein compression, otherwise known as May-Thurner (MT), is an anatomical risk factor for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MT refers to chronic compression of the left iliac vein against the lumbar spine by the overlying right common iliac artery. The compression may be asymptomatic. The syndrome is a clinical spectrum of physical findings and history plus the lesion. It is characterized by the varying degrees of venous hypertension. This can be non-thrombotic, combined with acute DVT or post-thrombotic. Traditionally, acute DVT was treated with standard anticoagulation and sometimes, thrombectomy. However these measures do not address the underlying culprit lesion of mechanical compression. Furthermore, if managed only with anticoagulation, patients with residual thrombus are at risk for developing recurrent DVT or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Both retrospective and prospective studies have shown that endovascular management should be the preferred approach to dissolve proximal thrombus and to also treat the underlying compression with endovascular stent placement.